The first one is "voltage potential taking over". Stan Meyer talks a lot about this in his videos/papers, by
"voltage potential taking over" I think he means: voltage performing the work, instead of a current (free energy basically).
Voltage potential is the force (electrostatic) which moves electrons through a circuit performing work.
According to my understanding: The positive charge is created by "holes" (or positive ions) on the + side of the battery. These holes are waiting to be filled by electrons and they create a "sucking" force which pulls negative elementary charge or electrons through circuits, spark gaps, electrolytes, etc.
What if you could some how have this "sucking" action without current/ charge flow from the (-) side of a battery? For example, suck the "holes" H+ ions and/or valance electrons out of H2O molecules. Or somehow "inject" electrons into a potential or electric field, and make the injected electrons perform work?
Here's how it might apply to electrolysis:
This is how it happens:
At the cathode two electrons "hit" two H2O molecules with a minimum energy (or velocity) of 1.23 eV (Volts), this causes the two H atoms to break free and combine to form H2, and 2OH(-) is left.. The 2OH(-) migrate (or propagate) across the cell toward the (+) side where the "sucking" action takes place.
After the reduction reaction occurs twice, you have 4OH(-) at the anode. The (+) charge in the battery continues to "suck" 4 negative charge/electrons (from within 4OH-) towards it to replace charge/electrons lost on the (-) side. (Note: These bound electrons have ~0 kinetic energy, unlike when they created H2). When the 4e- are sucked into the electrodes towards the battery O2(g) + 2H2O(l) are formed.
The second 'important' part of the Stan Meyer's "WFC" .. is what he called the "Electron Extraction Circuit" or EEC. From what I've read this is a key component to the functionality of the whole system. In a nutshell he talks about LED light injection and claims the wavelength required by his process is right around 300 nm (nanometers), he then talks about some sort of a "amp" consuming device attached to the circuit, and what he thinks is happening at the atomic level.. His descriptions of what happen at the atomic level probably got him laughed at a few times by scientists, and I doubt he actually knew what was occurring (his brother Steve Meyer admits this in an interview I heard on blogtalkradio) ..
So anyway, how could this photon injection actually contribute to his process? I thought about this, and this is my best guess:
There is an phenomenon in physics known as the "photoelectric effect", where electrons are emitted from matter (usually a metal) after the absorption of electromagnetic radiation (photons/light) of a specific (or minimum) energy, called the "work function". More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function .. The work function of Chromium (20 percent of stainless steel) is 4.5 eV which translates to a photon with a wavelength of 275 nm (which is in the ultraviolet range).
I doubt either of these ideas could work to extract extra energy out of a cell, but it would be interesting to do some experiments with UV LEDs. And try to eject electrons out of your (-) electrode and see if they'll perform work (electrolysis). Steve Meyer also mentioned eventual electrode consumption/deteriation through the Stan Meyer process.

