<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162</id><updated>2012-02-10T14:11:38.418-08:00</updated><title type='text'>H2 SCIENCE</title><subtitle type='html'>I've been having a hard time finding detailed (free) information regarding electrolysis.  So, this research/info blog is my attempt to explain the science behind H2O electrolysis, HHO boosting engines, hydrogen burn properties, and the everything else related to H2 O2 (hydroxy) gas.  Personal speculation is welcome as long as it's noted, or backed by some facts or experimental scientific data. WARNING: Some information may be incorrect here feel free to comment if you notice something.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>20</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-2090405086320971115</id><published>2009-02-17T14:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-18T09:48:01.369-08:00</updated><title type='text'>my thoughts on the Stan Meyer "WFC"</title><content type='html'>From what I've read,  Stan Meyer's (theoretical) electrolysis process involves several mechanisms ("theoretical" because I've never seen a working S. Meyer WFC replication  despite the many attempts).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The first one is &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;"voltage potential taking over"&lt;/span&gt;.   Stan Meyer talks a lot about this in his videos/papers, by&lt;br /&gt;"voltage potential taking over"  I think he means: voltage performing the work, instead of a current (free energy basically).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Voltage potential is the force (electrostatic) which moves electrons through a circuit  performing work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to my understanding:   The positive charge  is created by "holes" (or positive ions)  on the + side of the battery.   These holes are waiting to be filled by electrons and they create  a "sucking" force which pulls negative elementary charge or electrons through circuits, spark gaps, electrolytes, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What if you could some how have this "sucking" action without current/ charge flow from the (-) side of a battery? For example, suck the "holes" H+ ions and/or valance electrons out of H2O molecules.     Or somehow "inject" electrons into a potential or electric field, and make the injected electrons perform work?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's how it might apply to electrolysis:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;dl&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cathode (reduction): 2&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water" title="Water"&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;/a&gt;(&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;) + 2e&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt; → &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen" title="Hydrogen"&gt;H&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;(&lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt;) + 2&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxide" title="Hydroxide"&gt;OH&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;(&lt;i&gt;aq&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Anode (oxidation): 4&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxide" title="Hydroxide"&gt;OH&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;(&lt;i&gt;aq&lt;/i&gt;) → &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen" title="Oxygen"&gt;O&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;(&lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt;) + 2&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water" title="Water"&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;/a&gt;(&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;) + 4e&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;These reactions occur at a ratio of 2:1 .. reduction to oxidation, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is how it happens:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the cathode two electrons "hit" two H2O molecules  with a minimum energy (or velocity) of 1.23 eV (Volts), this causes the two H atoms to break free and combine to form H2,    and 2OH(-) is left..     The 2OH(-) migrate (or propagate) across the cell toward the (+) side where the "sucking" action takes place.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the reduction reaction occurs twice, you have 4OH(-) at the anode.   The (+) charge in the battery continues to "suck" 4 negative charge/electrons (from within 4OH-)  towards it to replace charge/electrons lost on the (-) side.  (Note: These bound electrons have ~0 kinetic energy, unlike when they created H2).   When the 4e-  are sucked into the electrodes towards the battery &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen" title="Oxygen"&gt;O&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;(&lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt;) + 2&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water" title="Water"&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;/a&gt;(&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;)     are formed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The second 'important' part of the Stan Meyer's "WFC"  .. is what he called the "&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Electron Extraction Circuit" &lt;/span&gt;or EEC&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;      From  what I've read this is a key component to the functionality of the whole system.  In  a nutshell he talks about LED light injection and claims the wavelength required by his process is right around 300 nm (nanometers), he then talks about some sort of a "amp" consuming device attached to the circuit, and what he thinks is happening at the atomic level..       His descriptions of what happen at the atomic level probably got him laughed at a few times by scientists,   and I doubt he actually knew what was occurring (his brother Steve Meyer admits this in an interview I heard on blogtalkradio) ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So anyway,    how could this photon injection actually contribute to his process?     I thought about this, and this is my best guess:     &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is an phenomenon in physics known as the "photoelectric effect", where electrons are emitted from matter (usually a metal) after the absorption of electromagnetic radiation (photons/light) of a specific (or minimum) energy, called the  "work function".   More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function   ..    The work function of Chromium (20 percent of stainless steel) is 4.5 eV    which translates to a photon with a wavelength of 275 nm (which is in the ultraviolet range).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I doubt either of these ideas could work to extract extra energy out of a cell, but it would be interesting to do some experiments with UV LEDs. And try to eject electrons out of your (-) electrode and see if they'll perform work (electrolysis).  Steve Meyer also mentioned eventual electrode consumption/deteriation through the Stan Meyer process.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-2090405086320971115?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/2090405086320971115/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=2090405086320971115' title='27 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/2090405086320971115'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/2090405086320971115'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2009/02/thought-on-stan-meyer-wfc.html' title='my thoughts on the Stan Meyer &quot;WFC&quot;'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>27</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-5692374490649551037</id><published>2009-01-25T12:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-29T17:32:00.889-08:00</updated><title type='text'>BBC leakage</title><content type='html'>Here is an image of the formation of Hydrogen and Oxygen on the outside of the positive and negative terminal plates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This might be normal operation of a series neutral plate cell, but it might not.      HHO didn't form on the outside of the plates with a weak NaOH electrolyte solution, or at least I didn't notice any.  However, once a higher concentration of NaOH was added the outside HHO formation started again...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cell is full of leaks and will have to be redone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SXzJNa5eDgI/AAAAAAAAADw/TRIarUYuJZA/s1600-h/current_leakage.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 286px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SXzJNa5eDgI/AAAAAAAAADw/TRIarUYuJZA/s400/current_leakage.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5295328494276709890" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-5692374490649551037?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/5692374490649551037/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=5692374490649551037' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/5692374490649551037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/5692374490649551037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2009/01/bbc-leakage.html' title='BBC leakage'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SXzJNa5eDgI/AAAAAAAAADw/TRIarUYuJZA/s72-c/current_leakage.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-1723952749412994932</id><published>2008-11-30T11:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-02T09:55:08.845-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Efficiency and temperature Equations</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gibbs Energy of Formation (with variable temperature) = &lt;/span&gt;ΔG = (ΔH * (298.15/T1)) - T1ΔS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;T1 = Temperature of cell Electrolyte &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;(user input)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;T2 = Temperature of HHO Gas coming out of cell &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;(user input)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;ΔH = -285.85 ( kJ / mole h2o liquid) at 25C (298.15 K)  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;(constant)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ΔS = -163.34 (J / K) = (Entropy of Water) - (Entropy of HHO Gas) &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;(constant)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;For example,   at  a temperature electrolyte/cell temperature of 38C (311.15 K) the Gibbs Energy of formation might change to:           ΔG =  (-285850 &lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;J&lt;/span&gt; * (298.15 &lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;K&lt;/span&gt; / 311.15 &lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;K)&lt;/span&gt;) - (311.15 &lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;K&lt;/span&gt; * -163.34 &lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;J/K&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;                                               &lt;/span&gt;ΔG = -223.05 kJ / mol&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So to disassociate 1 mole of H2O with a cell temperature of 38C,  223.05 kJ of electricity is needed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This will produce 1 mole of H2 gas, and .5 mole of O2 gas:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;22.4 L * (1.5 moles) = 33.6 L  (@ 298 Kelvin)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the gas temperature is 308.5 Kelvin (T2)  the volume will be 33.6 * (T2  / 298.15) = 34.78 Liters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convert to Watts/LPM:&lt;br /&gt;223.05 kJ / 3600 s = 61.95 Watts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convert 34.78 L/hr to LPM:     34.78 / 60 = .58 LPM&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convert to W/LPM: (1/.58) * 61.95 W = 106.81 W/LPM&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convert to MMW:  1000/106.8 W = 9.39 MMW&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Calculate Voltage required from Faraday (below):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;107.205  Amp/Hr  will create 73.338 L (at 25C), and 75.92 L at  *  38 C  (73.338 * 308.5/298)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(61.95 W * 2) = 107.205 A * V&lt;br /&gt;Volts =  1.15 V&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-1723952749412994932?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/1723952749412994932/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=1723952749412994932' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1723952749412994932'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1723952749412994932'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/11/efficiency-formulas.html' title='Efficiency and temperature Equations'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-7213110833152109021</id><published>2008-11-26T07:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-01T20:33:20.267-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Faraday Efficiency</title><content type='html'>Faraday electrolysis efficiency uses quantities of electrons (coulombs) and gas volume to determine the efficiency of an electrolytic cell.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to Faraday law,  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;4 moles of electrons&lt;/span&gt; moving through a cell will create&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 2 moles&lt;/span&gt; of&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; H2 gas&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1 mole&lt;/span&gt; of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;O2 gas&lt;/span&gt;, at 100 percent &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Faraday Efficiency.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;How to calculate 100 percent Faraday Efficiency:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First convert 4 moles of electrons into amps.   (4 moles) * (avagadro's number) =&lt;br /&gt;4 * 6.0221417e23 = 2.408856716e24  (electrons)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then divide the total electrons by 1 Coulomb (quantity of electrons)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.4088567e24 (electrons)  /  6.24150947e18 (1 Coulomb) = 385941 Coulombs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now calculate the Amp Hours:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since  (1 Amp) = (1 Coulomb * 1 Second)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(385941 C) / (3600 Seconds) =  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;107.205 Amp Hours (Ah)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now figure out how much gas is in 2 moles of H2, and 1 mole of O2.&lt;br /&gt;According to the ideal gas law, one mole of gas has a volume of 24.446 Liters at 25 C, 1 Atm.  So:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3 moles) * 24.446 L/mol = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;73.338 Liters of HHO gas&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So this is as exciting as Faraday Efficiency gets, it deals with Amps and Moles only (not energy or voltage).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 107.205&lt;/span&gt; Amps over one hour will generate &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;73.338 &lt;/span&gt;Liters of H2 O2 gas at 100 percent efficiency. That's it, 100 percent Faraday Efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It gets interesting when you throw the &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Gibbs Energy of Formation &lt;/span&gt;of water into the equation.&lt;br /&gt;At 25 C the &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Gibbs Free Energy&lt;/span&gt; (see post below) 237.18 Joules are required to convert 1 mole of H2O into 1 mole of H2 gas and a 1/2 mole of O2 gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So from the above calculations we know:  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;107.205 &lt;/span&gt;Amps continuous for 1 Hour will create&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;3 moles&lt;/span&gt; of H2/O2 gas, which has a volume of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;73.338 Liters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we multiply the Gibbs Free Energy (energy used to create 1.5 moles of gas) by 2, we should get the actual energy required to make the above quantity, 3 moles of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;237.18 kJ * 2 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;474.36 kJ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convert 474.36 kJ to Watts:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;474360 Joules / 3600 seconds = 131.7666 Watts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now put everything together (amps + voltage)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since: Watts = Amps * Volts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;131.7666 Watts = 107.204 Amp  * Volts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Volts = 1.229 V&lt;/span&gt;    Which is considered the minimum voltage for electrolysis to occur at 25C, 101.325 kPa.  Which is also 100 percent Faraday, and "Gibbs" Efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Calculate W/LPM  and MMW:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;73.338 L/Hr /  60 Minutes  = 1.223 LPM&lt;br /&gt;Requires 131.76 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 LPM / 1.223 LPM = .81766&lt;br /&gt;.81766 * 131.76 Watts =  107.73&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;107.73 Watts will generate 1 LPM at 100 percent efficiency, or 9.282 MMW, at 25C 101.325 kPa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-7213110833152109021?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/7213110833152109021/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=7213110833152109021' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/7213110833152109021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/7213110833152109021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/11/faraday-efficiency.html' title='Faraday Efficiency'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-2546136758279381393</id><published>2008-11-25T15:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-01T08:58:41.881-08:00</updated><title type='text'>How to calculate Efficiency with Gibbs Energy of Formation</title><content type='html'>The actual energy efficiency formula considering the Gibbs energy of formationshould look like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To convert one mole of H2O into 1 mol H2 gas, and .5 mol O2 gas, according to the Gibbs Free energy, requires 237.18 kJ at 25 C, at 1 atm.  Total volume of H2 O2 gas is 36.669 Liters at 25 C (ideal gas law:  1.5 moles * 24.446 Liters)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Convert 237.18 kJ to Watts  ...   237180 Joules / 3600 seconds in hour = 65.883 Watts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;33.6 Liters of HHO gas  over 60 minutes =    33.6/60 = .56 LPM (Liters per minute)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So 100 percent efficiency at 25 C and  101.325 kPa  ..   at 65.883 Watts you'll be making .61115 LPM&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or at 1 LPM you'll be consuming &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;107.801&lt;/span&gt; Watts, and have a MMW of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;9.27&lt;/span&gt;  (at 25C water and gas temp, and 101.325 kPa pressure).   Temperature of gas and water, and pressure,  will change these numbers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-2546136758279381393?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/2546136758279381393/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=2546136758279381393' title='49 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/2546136758279381393'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/2546136758279381393'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/11/energy-efficiency-with-gibbs.html' title='How to calculate Efficiency with Gibbs Energy of Formation'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>49</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-4565532957102525137</id><published>2008-11-24T14:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-30T10:19:10.822-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Efficiency - Gibbs Energy of Formation</title><content type='html'>The &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Gibbs Free Energy&lt;/span&gt; of a system is the &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;thermodynamic potential&lt;/span&gt; that measures the "useful" work obtainable from a thermodynamic system.   It can be thought of as the maximum amount of non-expansion work that can be extracted from a closed system. This maximum can be obtained from a completely reversible process.  The reverse is known as &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Gibbs Energy of Formation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;The thermodynamic equation is:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;G = U + pV - TS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;or&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;G = H - TS    or  &lt;/span&gt;ΔG = ΔH - TΔS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;G = Gibbs Energy&lt;br /&gt;U= &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Internal Energy&lt;/span&gt; = (The total kinetic and  potential energy associated with the vibrational and electric energy of atoms within molecules.   Or the energy in all chemical bonds  and kinetic energy of free conduction band electrons.) Measured in Joules.&lt;br /&gt;P = Pressure. Measured in Pascals&lt;br /&gt;V = Volume. Measured in cubic meters.&lt;br /&gt;T = Temperature. Measured in Kelvins.&lt;br /&gt;S = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Entropy = &lt;/span&gt;Measured in (Joules/Kelvins) = The total energy of a system that is unable to perform work. Function of a quantity of heat which shows the possibility of conversion of heat to work.&lt;br /&gt;H = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Enthalpy &lt;/span&gt;= A thermodynamic potential which can be used to calculate the "useful" work obtainable from a closed system, under constant temperature and pressure.&lt;br /&gt;Δ = change in x value&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To calculate the internal energy U,  you first need to calculate the work (energy) required to decompress one mole of H2O liquid into H2 + (.5)O2 gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Note: &lt;/span&gt; 1 mole of water creates 1 mole of hydrogen gas and .5 mole of oxygen gas, total (1.5 mol)&lt;br /&gt;Also, one mole of an ideal gas creates a volume of 22.4 L, so (1.5 mol)*(22.4 L) = 33.6 L (at 0C, 1 atmosphere), one mole of water turned into HHO gas has a volume of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;33.6 L&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;W = work to decompress one mole H2O&lt;br /&gt;T= 298.15 K&lt;br /&gt;P = standard atmospheric pressure = 101.325 kPa * 1000 = 101325 Pa&lt;br /&gt;V (in cubic meters) = (1.5 moles) * (22.4 L)  * 10e-3 =  .336 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;W&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; = PΔV&lt;/span&gt; = (101325 Pa) * (.336 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;/mol) * (298.15 K / 273 K) = 3715 Joules = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;3.72 kJ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Using the enthalpy equation &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;H = U+PV you can get:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ΔU = ΔH - PΔV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ΔH&lt;/span&gt; = 285.83 kJ (this value can be looked up here: &lt;a href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/data.html"&gt;http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/data.html&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ΔU&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;= &lt;/span&gt;285.83 kJ - 3.72 kJ = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;282.1 kJ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;And TΔS needs to be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ΔQ = TΔS =&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Heat Generated by the system &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;to maintain a constant temperature&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Electrolysis is an endothermic reaction which would otherwise decrease the temperature of a system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ΔS&lt;/span&gt; = Entropy of a chemical reaction  = (Entropy of 1 mole H2O liquid) - [ (Entropy of H2 gas) + (Entropy of .5 * O2 gas)]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Values can be looked up:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Quantity&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;0.5 O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;Change&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Enthalpy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;-285.83 kJ&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;0&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;0&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;ΔH = 285.83 kJ&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Entropy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;69.91 J/K&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;130.68 J/K&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;0.5 x 205.14 J/K&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;center&gt;TΔS = 48.7 kJ&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ΔS&lt;/span&gt; = 69.91 J/K mol - [ 130.68 J/K mol + (.5 * 205.4 J/K mol) ] = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;-163.34 J/K mol&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now figure out what TΔS is.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;T = 298K&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;298 K * -163.34 J/K = 48675 J =&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 48.7 kJ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So now we can use the first equation to figure out the Gibbs Free Energy:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ΔG = ΔH - TΔS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ΔG = &lt;/span&gt;285.83 kJ - 48.7 kJ =  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;237.1 kJ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-4565532957102525137?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/4565532957102525137/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=4565532957102525137' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/4565532957102525137'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/4565532957102525137'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/11/efficiency-gibbs-energy-of-formation.html' title='Efficiency - Gibbs Energy of Formation'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-6160648859899078877</id><published>2008-11-03T09:29:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-11T20:11:10.836-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Efficiency - Heat generation and loss</title><content type='html'>While an electrolysis cell is producing H2 O2 gas, most of the time it is producing heat as well. You might be thinking the amount of heat lost in a cell isn't a useful measurement. But it can be useful for the following reasons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thermal measurements can be used to determine your cells overall efficiency.  For example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(H2 Gas Energy in Joules) +  (Heat Generated in Joules)&lt;br /&gt;/   (Electrical Energy in Joules)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Should give you an accurate measurement of your cells efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Ambient air temperature) / (Cell temperature) may work as well to determine efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you are approaching 100 percent efficiency, the heat output can be used to determine if any &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;excess heat/energy&lt;/span&gt; is being generated (more energy out than into cell),  this is a big consideration in cold fusion experiments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Heat loss can occur the following ways:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Through the outside &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;cell material &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;(HDPE, gaskets, etc)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; or electrolyte exposed to ambient air.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. From &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;generated gas&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Through a &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;water circulation&lt;/span&gt; system (Bubblers, Pumps/Tanks, etc)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To calculate heat loss through cell construction material (or electrolyte exposed to air), several variables are required (once the cell warmed up).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Air temperature&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Surface temperature&lt;/span&gt; of external cell material&lt;br /&gt;-  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Surface area&lt;/span&gt; of each external cell material exposed to ambient air (plates, acrylic, electrolyte, etc)&lt;br /&gt;- The &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Time &lt;/span&gt;which you are measuring your cell's efficiency and gas output.&lt;br /&gt;- Thermal &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;conductivity of materials&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img class="tex" alt=" \frac{d Q}{d t} = h \cdot A(T_{0} - T_{\text{env}}) " src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/5/e/d5ef0d81df17b834bffcded352df0cfd.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q = thermal energy transfered in in Joules&lt;br /&gt;t = Time (seconds)&lt;br /&gt;h = thermal conductivity of material (W/(m·K)&lt;br /&gt;A = surface area inside cell of conducting material (meters^2)&lt;br /&gt;T(0) = outside temperature of material (C)&lt;br /&gt;T(env) = temperature of environment (air)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NOTE:  The Thermal conductivity (&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;h&lt;/span&gt;)  of a material are measured in:  W/(m·K)&lt;br /&gt;The English version:  Btu·ft/(h·ft²·°F) can be converted with the following:&lt;br /&gt;1 Btu·ft/(h·ft²·°F) = 1.730735 W/(m·K).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A list of Thermal conductivity measurements can be found here: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_thermal_conductivities"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_thermal_conductivities&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(these measurements were taken around room temperature. Temperature isn't a huge factor here imo)&lt;br /&gt;A few examples:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stainless Steel:     &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;16.3&lt;/span&gt;       (W·m&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;·K&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;Acrylic:   &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;0.2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;  &lt;/sup&gt;  (W·m&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;·K&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;Air: &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 0.025 &lt;/span&gt;  (W·m&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;·K&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;High-Density Polymer:   &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;.33 &lt;/span&gt;  (W·m&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;·K&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;Low-density Polymer:    &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;.16 &lt;/span&gt;  (W·m&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;·K&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;UHMW-PE:  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;5.053&lt;/span&gt;   (W·m&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;·K&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You have a 12" x 6" x 7" UHMW-PE   box cell.    2.5833 sq ft&lt;br /&gt;The outside temperature of the box is 110F&lt;br /&gt;The outside air temperature is 75F.&lt;br /&gt;And you want to determine the heat energy loss of the cell (running at constant temp) over 60 seconds, do the following:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Feet to meters conversion =&gt; 1 foot = 0.3048 meter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.5833 (sq ft) * .3048  =  .78738 m^2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Fahrenheit to Celsius conversion =&gt;   subtract 32, and divide by 1.8&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Outside box temperature = (110F - 32) / 1.8 =   43.33 C&lt;br /&gt;Outside air temperature = (75F - 32_ / 1.8 = 23.88 C&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Heat Loss Equation:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Q/t) = h * A * (T.cell - T.air)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; (Q/60) = 5.053 * .7873 * (43.33 - 23.88)&lt;br /&gt;--&gt;  Q/60 = 77.37&lt;br /&gt;--&gt;  &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Q = 4642 Joules&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So the cell material is losing 4642 Joules every 60 seconds in heat energy.  Or  77.43 Watts&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-6160648859899078877?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/6160648859899078877/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=6160648859899078877' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/6160648859899078877'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/6160648859899078877'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/11/efficiency-heat-generation-and-loss.html' title='Efficiency - Heat generation and loss'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-1972304561529769310</id><published>2008-11-01T13:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-02T06:57:44.666-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Electrolysis Efficiency - Factors</title><content type='html'>1. Heat generated by cell, and heat loss in cell&lt;br /&gt;2. Heat loss from gas generated&lt;br /&gt;3. Pressure within electrolysis cell&lt;br /&gt;4. Over-voltage from power source&lt;br /&gt;5. Ohmic resistance of electrolyte between electrodes&lt;br /&gt;6. Even spacing of electrodes&lt;br /&gt;7. Current/Ion leakage between cells&lt;br /&gt;8. Bubbles (gas) between electrodes&lt;br /&gt;9. Ambient temperature&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'll be writing about, and researching, the above topics for my next posts.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-1972304561529769310?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/1972304561529769310/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=1972304561529769310' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1972304561529769310'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1972304561529769310'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/11/electrolysis-efficiency-bubbles.html' title='Electrolysis Efficiency - Factors'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-4613355668097790194</id><published>2008-10-30T06:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-11-26T21:37:14.774-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Bohr Hydrogen Model</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Hydrogen Energy Levels (Bohr)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP5JBciktOI/AAAAAAAAABY/p9liXPjyAtk/s1600-h/hyde3.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP5JBciktOI/AAAAAAAAABY/p9liXPjyAtk/s400/hyde3.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5259721704005219554" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I consider this a 2 dimensional view of the H atom.   This basically says an electron moving with 13.6eV of energy can push an electron out of a ground state hydrogen 'orbital' or energy level. The ground state binding energy of H is -13.6eV. More details here &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;How fast does an electron travel at 13.6eV?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;13.6 * 1eV = 2.178960082e-18 Joules&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; E = (1/2)*mass*velocity^2&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; 2.178960082e-18 = (1/2) * electronmass * v^2&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; 4.78399e12 = v^2&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;v = 2.1872365e6  m/s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;    &lt;/span&gt;OR  fine structure constant (a) * speed of light (c)&lt;br /&gt;---&gt;  a * c&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; .0072973 * 2.99792e8&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;2.18769e6 m/s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How can 1.23 eV and 13.6 eV be determined/derived?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Experimentally and with math.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For some unknown reason alpha * c equates to the velocity a hydrogen atom electron in it's ground state (alpha is also known as a binding constant).   I consider  -13.6eV as the "electrostatic force" required to hold the electron in place, in a ground state.  And 13.6eV is the electron kinetic energy required to overcome that force.  More details here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;eV = 1 electronvolt = 1.602e-19 J&lt;br /&gt;Energy = (1/2) * electronmass * v^2&lt;br /&gt;E = (1/2) * 9.10938e-31 (kg) * (a*c)^2&lt;br /&gt;E =  2.17987e-18 Joules&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 2.17987e-18 J / 1 eV = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;13.605 eV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you want units to make sense do this:   &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1 V = (1 Joule) / (1 Coulomb)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;e = elementary charge = 1.602e-19 Coulombs&lt;br /&gt;Energy to break H2O bonds at 25C = 3.93846588e-19 J (explained below)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;V =  (3.938e-19 J) / (2 * e)            (two elementary_charges (electrons) required to break H-O-H bonds)&lt;br /&gt;V = 1.229 Volts&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can also confirm this experimentally with the H2O Gibbs Energy at 25C (237.18 kJ / mol), which is the energy that can be extracted from one mole of hydrogen gas, and the electrical energy required to break a mole of H2O bonds:    H2O --&gt; O(-)   +   2H(+)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So take:   237.18 kJ / mol  *  1000 =  237180 J / mol&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then, divide by avogadro's number (the number of entities per mole) 6.0221417e23&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;237180 (Joules/mol)   /  6.0221417e23  (entities/mol)  =&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 3.93846588e-19  Joules per Entity (per H2O molecule)  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So now we have the energy required to break two bonds within the H2O molecule into 2H(+)   and O(-) ..&lt;br /&gt;Divide that by 2 bonds --&gt;  1.9692e-19 (J / bond)&lt;br /&gt;Determine volts per electrons --&gt; 1.9692e-19 / ev = 1.229 eV (energy to break each bond)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Electrolysis at 25C, 1 atm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQvMFb7RLyI/AAAAAAAAACo/JVtDGPhRp9o/s1600-h/electrol.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 285px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQvMFb7RLyI/AAAAAAAAACo/JVtDGPhRp9o/s400/electrol.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5263524983280316194" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Valance Electron wavelength&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;br = Bohr radius = 5.29177e-11 m&lt;br /&gt;n = energy level of H in h2o&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;wavelength = 2*pi*n*br&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;--&gt; wavelength = 2 * pi * 3.354 * 5.29e-11&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;--&gt; wavelength = 1.115177e-9 (m^-1)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Velocity of Electron at 1.23 eV&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;--&gt; 1.23 * eV = 1.97e-19 J&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; 1.97e-19 = (1/2) * electronmass * v^2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; v = 657776 m/s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP5J6u3dWHI/AAAAAAAAABg/fOuQQz4sBg0/s1600-h/hyde4.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP5J6u3dWHI/AAAAAAAAABg/fOuQQz4sBg0/s400/hyde4.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5259722688177199218" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-4613355668097790194?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/4613355668097790194/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=4613355668097790194' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/4613355668097790194'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/4613355668097790194'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/bohr-hydrogen-model.html' title='Bohr Hydrogen Model'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP5JBciktOI/AAAAAAAAABY/p9liXPjyAtk/s72-c/hyde3.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-7169908488046343368</id><published>2008-10-28T09:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-30T09:45:39.225-07:00</updated><title type='text'>H2O Vibrations</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/v1.gif"&gt;Animation of H2O molecule movement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was curious how to determine the vibratory resonant frequency of a water molecule, so I came up with a few ideas:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I believe the velocity/energy of the covalent electron is directly responsible for the molecules frequency/vibrations.  The faster the electron moves in response to heat/current, the more rapidly the molecule vibrates/rotates, in the above patterns.   If the covalent electrons reach 13.6 eV (kinetic energy)  the energized H(+) atom leaves the molecule, and if energy exceeds (13.6 eV) photons are released (excess energy) as heat. (from my understanding)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, if you take 13.6 eV  (total energy of bond required to release electron/proton at 25C)    Then subtract 1.23 eV (energy of electron to break H2O bond)  You get:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;13.6 - 1.23 = 12.37 eV&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;12.37 eV * 1.602e-19 Joules (1 eV) =   1.9818e-18 Joules (kinetic energy of covalent electrons)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Using: Kinetic_Energy = (1/2) * mass * velocity^2&lt;br /&gt;1.9818e-18 J = electron_rest_mass * v^2&lt;br /&gt;v = 2.085e6 m/s   (at 25C)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is, I believe, is the velocity of the H2O vibrations.  I don't know for sure because I don't have $25 to spend on an article.   But I did find this for free:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table summary="Bend and stretch vibrations of ordinary and heavy water" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="99%"&gt;       &lt;caption&gt;       &lt;strong&gt;Main vibrations of liquid ordinary and heavy water &lt;/strong&gt;       &lt;/caption&gt;       &lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" rowspan="2" width="265"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Vibration(s)              [&lt;a title="go to cited reference" href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ref10.html#r942"&gt;942&lt;/a&gt;] &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" colspan="2"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;liquid H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O              (25°C) &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" colspan="2"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;liquid D&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O              (25°C) &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;       &lt;/tr&gt;       &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" width="110"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;,              cm&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" width="124"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;abbr title="molar absorptivity"&gt;E&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;, M&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; cm&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" width="110"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;,              cm&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;th scope="col" width="124"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;abbr title="molar absorptivity"&gt;E&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;,              M&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; cm&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/th&gt;       &lt;/tr&gt;       &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;th scope="row"&gt;&lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;1643.5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;21.8&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;1209.4&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;17.4&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;/tr&gt;       &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;th scope="row"&gt;combination of &lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;+ libration&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;2127.5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;3.50&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;1555.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;1.91&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;/tr&gt;       &lt;tr&gt;         &lt;th scope="row"&gt;&lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;, &lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; , and overtone of &lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/th&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;3404.0&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a title="click for an explanation" href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/vibrat.html#e"&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a name="be" id="be"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;99.9&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;2504.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;         &lt;td&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;71.5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;       &lt;/tr&gt;     &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;These are the  wavelengths of H2O/D2O vibrations, and their  vibrational patterns, which was all figured out using Raman spectroscopy.     Or lasers (photons) that interact with the vibrational motion of an electron cloud/shell.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raman_spectroscopy"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raman_spectroscopy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_Raman_spectroscopy"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_Raman_spectroscopy&lt;/a&gt; (more interesting)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, if the water molecule is vibrating at  2.085e6 m/s   (at 25C), with the above wavelengths we can figure out the vibrational frequency with:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQaLaaWH_NI/AAAAAAAAACc/5QG8-0pQVsQ/s1600-h/wavelength.png"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer; width: 50px; height: 40px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQaLaaWH_NI/AAAAAAAAACc/5QG8-0pQVsQ/s400/wavelength.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5262046500493982930" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;w = (v / f)      or    f = (v / w)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;font-size:130%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;w=wavelength&lt;br /&gt;v=velocity =   2.085e6 m/s   (at 25C)&lt;br /&gt;f=frequency&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From above table H2O has the following vibrational wavelengths (in meters):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;v2 = 16.435&lt;br /&gt;v2 + liberation = 21.275&lt;br /&gt;v1, v3, and v2 overtone = 34.04&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The frequencies are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the velocity is 2.085e6:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;v2:  f =   2.085e6 / 16.435 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;126,952 hz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;v2 + lib = 2.085e6 / 21.275 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;98,071 hz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;v1, v3, and v2 overtone 2.085e6 / 34.04 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;61,294 hz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;If velocity is actually "c" the speed of light, since photons/light are used to determine the wavelength.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;v2:  f =   c / 16.435 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;18,241,098.75     hz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;v2 + lib = c  / 21.275 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;14,091,302.37 hz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;v1, v3, and v2 overtone = c / 34.04 = &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;8,087,063.98&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; hz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These are all pretty low frequencies, and close to the BB pwm, and it's interesting they're almost harmonics of 30khz, and      v2:  126,952 / 42800 hz    =  2.966 is almost a harmonic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Frequencies.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What kind of frequencies do water molecules have?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.) Vibratory/rotational frequencies (above) is  based on the moment of inertia of the water molecule, and the lightness of the hydrogen molecules (creating large amplitudes).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; moment of inertia&lt;/span&gt; or &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;angular mass &lt;/span&gt;of a water molecule is a measure of an object's resistance to changes in its rotation rate (rotational analog of mass).  There are several types of molecular rotations, which can be seen here:  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_spectroscopy"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_spectroscopy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;H2O has a "Asymmetric top" rotation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/diph2o.html"&gt;http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/diph2o.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;Moment of inertia (axes through centers of mass) in water:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O: 1.0220                x 10&lt;sup&gt;-40&lt;/sup&gt; g cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;sup&gt;&lt;a title="click for an explanation" href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/data.html#x"&gt;x&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;; 2.9376 x 10&lt;sup&gt;-40&lt;/sup&gt; g cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a title="click for an explanation" href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/data.html#y"&gt;&lt;sup&gt;y&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;;                1.9187 x 10&lt;sup&gt;-40&lt;/sup&gt; g cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a title="click for an explanation" href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/data.html#z"&gt;&lt;sup&gt;z&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a title="go to cited reference" href="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ref.html#r8"&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;2.) Photon emission at specific frequencies from electrons changing energy levels.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-7169908488046343368?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/7169908488046343368/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=7169908488046343368' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/7169908488046343368'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/7169908488046343368'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/h2o-vibrations.html' title='H2O Vibrations'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQaLaaWH_NI/AAAAAAAAACc/5QG8-0pQVsQ/s72-c/wavelength.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-8038829029661023809</id><published>2008-10-24T17:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-25T10:08:12.834-07:00</updated><title type='text'>PWMs + Spikes</title><content type='html'>These digital scope pictures are from a Bob Boyce PWM channel one (made by  a user on the hydroxy forum)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJk5qNNvxI/AAAAAAAAABs/FoHW4mXZg2s/s1600-h/pulse1.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 298px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJk5qNNvxI/AAAAAAAAABs/FoHW4mXZg2s/s400/pulse1.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5260878256467197714" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="bold"&gt;Fast pulse!&lt;/div&gt;  Channel 1 is coil primary 10:1 500MHz probe, Channel 2 is coil secondary, cheap 1:1 probe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJlh7hEVmI/AAAAAAAAAB0/0MkrGcPMvKo/s1600-h/pulse2.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 299px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJlh7hEVmI/AAAAAAAAAB0/0MkrGcPMvKo/s400/pulse2.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5260878948308637282" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="bold"&gt;Faster HV Pulse!&lt;/div&gt;  Channel 1 is coil primary #1 10:1 500MHz probe, Channel 2 is coil primary #2 (undriven and unloaded), cheap 1:1 probe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJl-no9e4I/AAAAAAAAAB8/W8QoPEUzeqU/s1600-h/pulse3.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 299px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJl-no9e4I/AAAAAAAAAB8/W8QoPEUzeqU/s400/pulse3.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5260879441189239682" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="bold"&gt;Electrodynamic Response?&lt;/div&gt;  Same as earlier shot, but with area in question marked. A 10K resistor is across the secondary to damp oscillations.&lt;br /&gt;By: &lt;a href="http://profiles.yahoo.com/software_lead"&gt;software_lead&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More on fast pulsing later.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-8038829029661023809?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/8038829029661023809/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=8038829029661023809' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/8038829029661023809'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/8038829029661023809'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/pulsing-scope-shots.html' title='PWMs + Spikes'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SQJk5qNNvxI/AAAAAAAAABs/FoHW4mXZg2s/s72-c/pulse1.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-6224251115932817777</id><published>2008-10-23T11:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-23T11:57:31.557-07:00</updated><title type='text'>UHMW-PE</title><content type='html'>FAQ.  Good information regarding fabrication, welding, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.garlandmfg.com/plastics/faq.html"&gt;http://www.garlandmfg.com/plastics/faq.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-6224251115932817777?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/6224251115932817777/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=6224251115932817777' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/6224251115932817777'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/6224251115932817777'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/uhmw-pe.html' title='UHMW-PE'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-1541954575598472301</id><published>2008-10-21T19:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-22T12:30:06.336-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Efficiency Experiment</title><content type='html'>I just thought of a possible easier way to test energy efficiency experimentally:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Separate your H2 and O2 gas produced in your electrolysis cell.   Then run the gas output into a "Hydrogen Fuel Cell"  and measure the electricity generated vs electricity consumed.  This would also be good for all the guys who claim their gas is more energetic, etc.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-1541954575598472301?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/1541954575598472301/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=1541954575598472301' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1541954575598472301'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1541954575598472301'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/experimental-efficiency-testing.html' title='Efficiency Experiment'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-400544490865029941</id><published>2008-10-19T16:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-23T18:57:28.895-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sealed Cell (Dry Cell) Efficiency</title><content type='html'>There are two ways to generate heat (lose efficiency) within a sealed dry cell (with neutral plates).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1.  Over voltage&lt;/span&gt;   -   When you only need, ie, 1.23V to create hydroxy gas  but use 4V to increase production, heat is generated instead of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;2. Current/Ion leakage  &lt;/span&gt;-  If you have holes in plates between cells, ions will rush through the hole to the higher potential plate, collide, and generate heat (and form H2O).  &lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153); font-weight: bold;"&gt;This is my best guess:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP0rMvIMcdI/AAAAAAAAABE/o78dSAXAHek/s1600-h/neturalplate.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP0rMvIMcdI/AAAAAAAAABE/o78dSAXAHek/s320/neturalplate.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5259407437647868370" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If 9 Volts is applied to the +/- electrodes,  there should  be 3V across each cell.    If there is a hole in the neutral plates ions will attempt to reach the next plate with the higher potential (6V), creating heat/H2O in the middle/edges.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-400544490865029941?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/400544490865029941/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=400544490865029941' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/400544490865029941'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/400544490865029941'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/sealed-cell-dry-cell-efficiency-ion.html' title='Sealed Cell (Dry Cell) Efficiency'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SP0rMvIMcdI/AAAAAAAAABE/o78dSAXAHek/s72-c/neturalplate.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-1298303369442982618</id><published>2008-10-17T16:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-17T17:00:56.067-07:00</updated><title type='text'>100 Percent Efficiency</title><content type='html'>3.95 kW will make 36.4 L/min     of HHO gas  (at 23 deg C)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3950 W /  36.4 L/min         =   &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;108.5   Watts   L/min  &lt;/span&gt;(23C)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;or 9.21 MMW &lt;/span&gt;(at 23C)&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-1298303369442982618?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/1298303369442982618/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=1298303369442982618' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1298303369442982618'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1298303369442982618'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/100-percent-efficiency.html' title='100 Percent Efficiency'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-1163443590372682879</id><published>2008-10-17T09:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-21T09:25:34.539-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Proton Exchange Membranes (PEM)</title><content type='html'>PEMs basically stop larger ion "migration" across a cell, while allowing H+ (protons) and electrons to move in one direction.   Neutral plates I believe might function in a similar manor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PEMs consist of a solid fluoropolymer which has been chemically altered to contain 'sulphonic acid groups' SO3H, which easily release their hydrogen as positively-charged protons (H+).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chemical equations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SO3H  +  ----&gt;  SO3(-)    + H(+)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I'm guessing this occurs on the other side: &lt;br /&gt;H3O(+)   + SO3 ---&gt;  H2O  +  SO3H&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;What really happens?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. An electron hits the S03H molecule in the PEM.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. A very slight amount energy is used,  then SO3H releases H(+) on the same side the electron hit.  Then  H(+)  travels toward the negative electrode  passing through OH- ions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. On the opposite side of the PEM,  a H3O(+) ion (in water) gives up a proton (H+) to the membrane's SO3 molecule, and the electron travels toward the positive electrode.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-1163443590372682879?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/1163443590372682879/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=1163443590372682879' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1163443590372682879'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1163443590372682879'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/key-to-efficienct-brute-force.html' title='Proton Exchange Membranes (PEM)'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-6359989696769109818</id><published>2008-10-15T13:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-19T10:28:03.981-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Electric Charge ..  Voltage .. What are they?</title><content type='html'>A little off topic,  but charge is fundamental thing which I feel is misunderstood and confusing.  So I'm gunna rant  about it a bit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's  a definition according to Wiki:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);"&gt;Electric charge is a fundamental conserved property of some subatomic particles, which determines their electromagnetic interaction. Electrically charged matter is influenced by, and produces, electromagnetic fields. The interaction between a moving charge and an electromagnetic field is the source of the electromagnetic force, which is one of the four fundamental forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;   &lt;p&gt;One from &lt;a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elecur.html"&gt;http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elecur.html :&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"&gt; The unit of electric charge is the Coulomb (abbreviated C). Ordinary matter is made up of atoms which have positively charged nuclei and negatively charged electrons surrounding them. Charge is quantized as a multiple of the electron or proton charge: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;left&gt;&lt;img src="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/imgele/echg.gif" /&gt;&lt;/left&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"&gt;The influence of charges is characterized in terms of the forces between them (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);" href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefor.html#c1"&gt;Coulomb's law&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"&gt;) and the electric field and voltage produced by them. One Coulomb of charge is the charge which would flow through a 120 watt lightbulb (120 volts AC) in one second. Two charges of one Coulomb each separated by a meter would repel each other with a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);" href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elefor.html#c2"&gt;force&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"&gt; of about a million tons!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Here's my definition  and/or  question:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Why is a unit of  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;elementary charge "e"&lt;/span&gt; not just simply considered the kinetic energy of an electron moving at a "base velocity" regulated by 'voltage potential'?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Could the polarity of a charge could be a property of spin, or something else?  It seems like  polarity should separate from 'charge'.     Is a proton ever considered "charge" due to its energy like electrons?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;electron volt (eV) &lt;/span&gt;is a convenient energy unit used by atomic and nuclear physicists.    &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1 eV&lt;/span&gt;  is the energy of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1 electron&lt;/span&gt; moving  through an electric potential of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1 volt  &lt;/span&gt;..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ev.html"&gt;http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ev.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 204, 51);"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);"&gt;Electrons don't really "move" in a conductor  they just "rattle" around within it.    There is an electron drift velocity which is the linear electron movement down a conductor which is very slow, about 4 cm per hour, or something like that.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;e = electron/elementary charge = 1.602 x 10^-19 Coulombs  (quantity)&lt;br /&gt;V = volts = 1&lt;br /&gt;1 eV = electron volt = 1.602 x 10^-19 Joules&lt;br /&gt;electron mass = &lt;span style="white-space: nowrap;"&gt;9.1093e-31 Kg&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So ..  1 volt = a potential gradient (force) which makes electrons move (rattle around)  fast enough to have 1.602e-19  Joules of &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;kinetic energy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;If:   Kinetic Energy (KE) =  (1/2) electron_mass * velocity (v)^2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.602e-19 J =  (1/2) * 9.1093e-31 * v^2&lt;br /&gt;--&gt;  3.5176e11 = v^2&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; sqrt(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;3.5176e11) = sqrt(v^2)&lt;br /&gt;--&gt; v =593097 meters/second &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then 1 volt is the amount of electrostatic potential (force) required to move electrons at 593097 m/s through a conductor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So what is voltage really?  I've read it's a 'electrical potential gradient'   ..  a 'pressure'  ..  But I'm thinking it is a real force (a 'collective' weak interaction/force?) that is responsible for "sucking" electrons through a conductor through "holes" or positive charged ions on the positive side of a battery   ..  See &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_hole"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_hole&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-6359989696769109818?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/6359989696769109818/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=6359989696769109818' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/6359989696769109818'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/6359989696769109818'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/electric-charge-voltage-what-are-they.html' title='Electric Charge ..  Voltage .. What are they?'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-631270556015941421</id><published>2008-10-13T09:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-17T08:54:45.489-07:00</updated><title type='text'>How electrolysis works to make HHO gas</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102); font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" &gt;Electrolysis &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"&gt;+ a little on efficiency&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We know .. That in order for electrolysis to occur we need current (charge)  and ions flowing through our water solution.    But we also need to have interaction between moving electrons and water molecules.  How do they interact?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 51, 0);"&gt;When you add electrolyte to water  not only does it increase the conductivity of the solution, but I'm thinking it also weakens the H-O-H covalent bonds,  and adds electrostatic polarization to the H2O molecules.    So now, the hydrogen within the H2O molecules absorb electrons (or charge) easier.    This also makes me wonder if there is a direct relationship between the bond strength of  the ionic compound (electrolyte) and the resistance (distance) between anodes/cathodes + performance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are the chemical equations for electrolysis:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Anode (negative plate)&lt;br /&gt;4H2O + 4e(-)  ------------&gt;  2H2(+)    + 4OH(-)            (reduction  or gains electrons)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"&gt;This doesn't show how 2OH(-) gets from the anode through the gap/solution to the cathode.   I'm assuming it just gradually migrates across the gap.  This article explains a little &lt;a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_/ai_89581012?tag=artBody;col1"&gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_/ai_89581012?tag=artBody;col1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The equation doesn't explain that  H2(+) is "charged" up and has more energy than it did within the water molecule ..   This is all probably basic stuff to most of you guys, but I like having more details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Cathode (positive plate)&lt;br /&gt;4OH(-)  ----------&gt; O2    +   2H2O    + 4e(-)      (oxidation  or loses electrons)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Together:    2H2O  ----------&gt;  2H2        +        O2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's a cool 3D animation of the reduction reaction&lt;a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0O1ZoPGu-C8"&gt; http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0O1ZoPGu-C8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nice visual reference from a Fuel Cell tutorial ... for electrolysis the opposite is actually happening:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SPO0wIWEBHI/AAAAAAAAAAc/9-Bc8D-eO8E/s1600-h/electro_transport.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SPO0wIWEBHI/AAAAAAAAAAc/9-Bc8D-eO8E/s320/electro_transport.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5256743929038242930" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the best visual example I could find .. however it's for a fuel cell (ie NASA shuttle generators).  But it's still easy to picture what will  happen in reverse.    One thing I'd like to add is the transfer or kinetic energy of the electrons.   In this fuel cell example the "energy of the electrons" (charge) are coming from the recombination of the H2 and O atoms   (which creates 237.18 kJ per mol of H2O formed, at room temp.)  ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's a reference &lt;a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/thermo/electrol.html"&gt;http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/thermo/electrol.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With electrolysis (the reverse) two electrons bounce into the H2O molecules with the same energy as above (or 1.9692e-19 Joules per electron) ,  which splits  the H2O  in    H-H-O gas  ..   Now this is an ideal situation using pure water, and would (in theory) create no extra heat within your electrolysis cell.   All the energy would go to gas production.     To figure out the voltage for this ideal condition, I'm thinking you would do something like this &lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"&gt;(NOT 100 percent sure, due to lack of info)&lt;/span&gt; ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since:              Volts =   Joules / Coulombs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;V =&lt;br /&gt;1.9692e-19 * 2   (optimal kinetic energy of two electrons about to split a water molecule)&lt;br /&gt;/&lt;br /&gt;2*e    (the elementary charge constant =  1.60e-19 coulombs times 2 (electrons))&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So ideally,  in pure water Volts = 1.229  ..  any higher than that you get heat.&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SPOtWsOYUnI/AAAAAAAAAAU/iPCJC6bgVFo/s1600-h/electro_transport.jpg"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-631270556015941421?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/631270556015941421/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=631270556015941421' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/631270556015941421'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/631270556015941421'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/how-electrolysis-works-to-make-hho-gas.html' title='How electrolysis works to make HHO gas'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4IQkhENWwQ/SPO0wIWEBHI/AAAAAAAAAAc/9-Bc8D-eO8E/s72-c/electro_transport.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-1151212638031020154</id><published>2008-10-09T11:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-13T10:40:39.105-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Electrolyte in H2O</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102); font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" &gt;What is an electrolyte?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's a substance that contains free + or - charged ions which is added to solution making it more electrically conductive (electrolytic).  There are two basic types of electrolytes:   &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Acids&lt;/span&gt;, which donate H+ ions to the water solution (base), and lower the pH. In water acids,  increase the concentration of hydrogen ions H+, which are carried as  H&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;O+.  Some examples are vinegar, sulfuric acid, and hydrochloric acid (HCl).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Bases&lt;/span&gt;, which are described as an aqueous substance that can accept protons (aka H+ ions).  Bases  are  the chemical opposite to Acids which give a solution a pH greater than 7.   An alkali (salt) is a base which, in a aqueous environment, donates hydroxide (OH&lt;sup&gt;_ &lt;/sup&gt;) ions.  Some examples are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NaOH     Sodium Hydroxide, "caustic soda"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;KOH       Potassium Hydroxide, "caustic potash"   (either of these can be found in "lye")&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CaCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;     Calcium Carbonate,  found in hard water, and used as an antacid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NaCl    Sodium Chloride, "table salt", (&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;WARNING&lt;/span&gt; creates chlorine gas when used in electrolysis)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 0, 153); font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" &gt;What happens when electrolyte is added to water solution?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(51, 0, 153); font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;The ionic compounds are held together by strong electrostatic forces, once they are added to water the ionic compounds  are pulled apart and disassociated into the water solution.   With the bond between ions weakened or gone, electricity now has a route through the water (and less resistance).   Here are some chemical equations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HCl        +        H2O   &lt;---------&gt;   H3O(+)     +        Cl(-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NaCL       +        H2O   &lt;---------&gt;   Na(+)      +        Cl(-)         +    H2O&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;KOH        +        H2O   &lt;---------&gt;    K(+)      +        OH(-)         +    H2O&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A lot more information here:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tutorvista.com/content/chemistry/chemistry-ii/electrolysis/electrolysisindex.php"&gt;http://www.tutorvista.com/content/chemistry/chemistry-ii/electrolysis/electrolysisindex.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nice animation for the visualization people (like me)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gN9euz9jzwc&amp;amp;feature=related"&gt;http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gN9euz9jzwc&amp;amp;feature=related&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 102); font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-1151212638031020154?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/1151212638031020154/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=1151212638031020154' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1151212638031020154'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/1151212638031020154'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/electrolytes-in-h2o.html' title='Electrolyte in H2O'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6825753426272053162.post-97148026895126322</id><published>2008-10-08T11:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-09T11:53:48.143-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Conductivity of Pure H2O</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"&gt;What makes water conduct current?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Water by itself is NOT a very good conductor, and deionized  pure H2O (ideally) is not conductive at all, but due to the self-ionizing properties of water it is actually slightly conductive.&lt;br /&gt;Here are the ions that exist in pure water:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;H3O+     = hydronium ion, the conductive property of pure water,  cation with + charge&lt;br /&gt;OH-            = hydroxide, the non-conductive (dielectric) property of water, anion with - charge&lt;br /&gt;H+                  = A proton, only exists for 70 μs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Equal  amounts of the above ions will form in pure water, though usually just in trace amounts (one pair for every 5.6e8 water molecules).   The more impurities (and electrolyte) in the water, the more conductivity (and ions).  Also, self-ionization is the process that determines the&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; pH of water.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"&gt;How do these ions form in pure water?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/ionis.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Water self-ionization occurs endothermically due to &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;electric field fluctuations between molecules &lt;/span&gt;caused by nearby dipole liberations, resulting thermal effects, and favorable localized hydrogen bonding;   a process that is facilitated by exciting the O-H stretch overtone vibration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0);"&gt;A little off topic speculation:  "Exciting the OH- stretch overtone vibration" is an interesting concept  and reminds me a lot of the Stan Meyer's saying:  "tune into the dielectric property of water" aka resonance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The above link also states:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ions may separate by means of the &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;"Grotthuss mechanism"&lt;/span&gt; but normally recombine within a few femtoseconds.  Rarely (about once every eleven hours per molecule at 25°C, or less than once a week at 0°C) the localized hydrogen bonding arrangement breaks before allowing the separated ions to return, and the pair of ions (H+,OH-) hydrate independently and continue their separate existance for about 70 μs. They tend to recombine when only separated by one or two water molecules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The equations look like this:&lt;br /&gt;H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O &lt;img src="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/ionis5.gif" alt="equilibrium arrows" border="0" height="10" width="32" /&gt;         H&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; + OH&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt; = [H&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;][OH&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt;]         (only lasts for 0.00007 seconds, then recombines)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Better written as:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2 H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O &lt;img src="http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/ionis5.gif" alt="equilibrium arrows" border="0" height="10" width="32" /&gt;         H&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; + OH&lt;sup&gt;-                   &lt;/sup&gt;(concentration of 1.0×10&lt;sup&gt;−7&lt;/sup&gt;mol/l at 25C)&lt;br /&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt; = [H&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;][OH&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt;]  = 1.0e-14           This is known as the &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;self-ionization constant&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Both ions create order and form stronger hydrogen        bonds with surrounding water molecules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6825753426272053162-97148026895126322?l=h2science.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/feeds/97148026895126322/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6825753426272053162&amp;postID=97148026895126322' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/97148026895126322'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6825753426272053162/posts/default/97148026895126322'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://h2science.blogspot.com/2008/10/conductivity-of-pure-h2o.html' title='Conductivity of Pure H2O'/><author><name>Greg T</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13576799905656417855</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry></feed>
